6 November 2009
“The
“The Court considers that Project Hayes is not the next best option for new generation in New Zealand, and so it would be preferable if other options were investigated more fully first. With other potential sites requiring their own, equally comprehensive analysis there is no way such an investigation could ever be achieved in a timely and effective manner.
“In addition the significant contribution that Project Hayes would have made to security of electricity supply has not been attributed with any value in the decision. This is despite wide acknowledgement of the issues
“New Zealanders value renewable energy, but this decision has the potential to make it more difficult for other renewable projects to achieve consent.” A public opinion poll commissioned by the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority in 2008 found that 94% of respondents felt renewable energy is something
“At some point we will have to find the balance between economic growth, increasing electricity prices, increasing emissions from electricity decisions, and effects on landscapes that some or all New Zealanders hold dear. The Project Hayes decision does little to help us understand where this balance is,” concludes Mr Clark.
ENDS
Email:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
2) The EECA study is available at http://www.eeca.govt.nz/sites/all/files/renewable-energy-nielsen-research-report-may-08.pdf